Biography

真実的-100％合格率のACD301受験記対策試験-試験の準備方法ACD301参考書内容

もしあなたはIT業種でもっと勉強になりたいなら、It-Passportsを選んだ方が良いです。It-PassportsのAppianのACD301試験トレーニング資料は豊富な経験を持っている専門家が長年の研究を通じて開発されたものです。それは正確性が高くて、カバー率も広いです。It-PassportsのAppianのACD301試験トレーニング資料を手に入れたら、成功に導く鍵を手に入れるのに等しいです。

あるAppianのACD301テストトレントに関しては、It-PassportsのACD301ガイドトレントが有効であるかどうかを示す最も強力な証拠となるのはパスレートのみであるため、パスレートが最高の広告になるというのが常識です。 有用かどうか。 すべてのお客様のフィードバックからの統計によると、ACD301テストトレントの指導の下で試験を準備したお客様の間でのACD301試験問題のAppian Lead Developer合格率は、 98％から100％に達しました。

>> ACD301受験記対策 <<

ACD301参考書内容、ACD301認定デベロッパー

お客様に最も信頼性の高いバックアップを提供するという信念から当社のACD301試験問題を作成し、優れた結果により、試験受験者の機能に対する心を捉えました。 ACD301練習資料は、3つのバージョンに分類できます。 これらのバージョンの使用はすべて、彼らに受け入れられています。 これらのバージョンのACD301模擬練習には大きな格差はありませんが、能力を強化し、レビュープロセスをスピードアップして試験に関する知識を習得するのに役立ちます。そのため、レビュープロセスは妨げられません。

Appian ACD301 認定試験の出題範囲：

Appian Lead Developer 認定 ACD301 試験問題 (Q12-Q17):

質問 # 12
A customer wants to integrate a CSV file once a day into their Appian application, sent every night at 1:00 AM. The file contains hundreds of thousands of items to be used daily by users as soon as their workday starts at 8:00 AM. Considering the high volume of data to manipulate and the nature of the operation, what is the best technical option to process the requirement?

• A. Use an Appian Process Model, initiated after every integration, to loop on each item and update it to the business requirements.
• B. Process what can be completed easily in a process model after each integration, and complete the most complex tasks using a set of stored procedures.
• C. Build a complex and optimized view (relevant indices, efficient joins, etc.), and use it every time a user needs to use the data.
• D. Create a set of stored procedures to handle the volume and the complexity of the expectations, and call it after each integration.

正解：D

解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:As an Appian Lead Developer, handling a daily CSV integration with hundreds of thousands of items requires a solution that balances performance, scalability, and Appian's architectural strengths. The timing (1:00 AM integration, 8:00 AM availability) and data volume necessitate efficient processing and minimal runtime overhead. Let's evaluate each option based on Appian's official documentation and best practices:
* A. Use an Appian Process Model, initiated after every integration, to loop on each item and update it to the business requirements:This approach involves parsing the CSV in a process model and using a looping mechanism (e.g., a subprocess or script task with fn!forEach) to process each item. While Appian process models are excellent for orchestrating workflows, they are not optimized for high- volume data processing. Looping over hundreds of thousands of records would strain the process engine, leading to timeouts, memory issues, or slow execution-potentially missing the 8:00 AM deadline. Appian's documentation warns against using process models for bulk data operations, recommending database-level processing instead. This is not a viable solution.
* B. Build a complex and optimized view (relevant indices, efficient joins, etc.), and use it every time a user needs to use the data:This suggests loading the CSV into a table and creating an optimized database view (e.g., with indices and joins) for user queries via a!queryEntity. While this improves read performance for users at 8:00 AM, it doesn't address the integration process itself. The question focuses on processing the CSV ("manipulate" and "operation"), not just querying. Building a view assumes the data is already loaded and transformed, leaving the heavy lifting of integration unaddressed. This option is incomplete and misaligned with the requirement's focus on processing efficiency.
* C. Create a set of stored procedures to handle the volume and the complexity of the expectations, and call it after each integration:This is the best choice. Stored procedures, executed in the database, are designed for high-volume data manipulation (e.g., parsing CSV, transforming data, and applying business logic). In this scenario, you can configure an Appian process model to trigger at 1:00 AM (using a timer event) after the CSV is received (e.g., via FTP or Appian's File System utilities), then call a stored procedure via the "Execute Stored Procedure" smart service. The stored procedure can efficiently bulk-load the CSV (e.g., using SQL's BULK INSERT or equivalent), process the data, and update tables-all within the database's optimized environment. This ensures completion by 8:00 AM and aligns with Appian's recommendation to offload complex, large-scale data operations to the database layer, maintaining Appian as the orchestration layer.
* D. Process what can be completed easily in a process model after each integration, and complete the most complex tasks using a set of stored procedures:This hybrid approach splits the workload: simple tasks (e.g., validation) in a process model, and complex tasks (e.g., transformations) in stored procedures. While this leverages Appian's strengths (orchestration) and database efficiency, it adds unnecessary complexity. Managing two layers of processing increases maintenance overhead and risks partial failures (e.g., process model timeouts before stored procedures run). Appian's best practices favor a single, cohesive approach for bulk data integration, making this less efficient than a pure stored procedure solution (C).
Conclusion: Creating a set of stored procedures (C) is the best option. It leverages the database's native capabilities to handle the high volume and complexity of the CSV integration, ensuring fast, reliable processing between 1:00 AM and 8:00 AM. Appian orchestrates the trigger and integration (e.g., via a process model), while the stored procedure performs the heavy lifting-aligning with Appian's performance guidelines for large-scale data operations.
References:
* Appian Documentation: "Execute Stored Procedure Smart Service" (Process Modeling > Smart Services).
* Appian Lead Developer Certification: Data Integration Module (Handling Large Data Volumes).
* Appian Best Practices: "Performance Considerations for Data Integration" (Database vs. Process Model Processing).

質問 # 13
You are required to configure a connection so that Jira can inform Appian when specific tickets change (using a webhook). Which three required steps will allow you to connect both systems?

• A. Create a Web API object and set up the correct security.
• B. Create a new API Key and associate a service account.
• C. Create an integration object from Appian to Jira to periodically check the ticket status.
• D. Give the service account system administrator privileges.
• E. Configure the connection in Jira specifying the URL and credentials.

正解：A、B、E

解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:Configuring a webhook connection from Jira to Appian requires setting up a mechanism for Jira to push ticket change notifications to Appian in real-time.
This involves creating an endpoint in Appian to receive the webhook and configuring Jira to send the data.
Appian's Integration Best Practices and Web API documentation provide the framework for this process.
* Option A (Create a Web API object and set up the correct security):This is a required step. In Appian, a Web API object serves as the endpoint to receive incoming webhook requests from Jira. You must define the API structure (e.g., HTTP method, input parameters) and configure security (e.g., basic authentication, API key, or OAuth) to validate incoming requests. Appian recommends using a service account with appropriate permissions to ensure secure access, aligning with the need for a controlled webhook receiver.
* Option B (Configure the connection in Jira specifying the URL and credentials):This is essential.
In Jira, you need to set up a webhook by providing the Appian Web API's URL (e.g., https://<appian- site>/suite/webapi/<web-api-name>) and the credentials or authentication method (e.g., API key or basic auth) that match the security setup in Appian. This ensures Jira can successfully send ticket change events to Appian.
* Option C (Create a new API Key and associate a service account):This is necessary for secure authentication. Appian recommends using an API key tied to a service account for webhook integrations. The service account should have permissions to process the incoming data (e.g., write to a process or data store) but not excessive privileges. This step complements the Web API security setup and Jira configuration.
* Option D (Give the service account system administrator privileges):This is unnecessary and insecure. System administrator privileges grant broad access, which is overkill for a webhook integration. Appian's security best practices advocate for least-privilege principles, limiting the service account to the specific objects or actions needed (e.g., executing the Web API).
* Option E (Create an integration object from Appian to Jira to periodically check the ticket status):This is incorrect for a webhook scenario. Webhooks are push-based, where Jira notifies Appian of changes. Creating an integration object for periodic polling (pull-based) is a different approach and not required for the stated requirement of Jira informing Appian via webhook.
These three steps (A, B, C) establish a secure, functional webhook connection without introducing unnecessary complexity or security risks.
References:Appian Documentation - Web API Configuration, Appian Integration Best Practices - Webhooks, Appian Lead Developer Training - External System Integration.
The three required steps that will allow you to connect both systems are:
* A. Create a Web API object and set up the correct security. This will allow you to define an endpoint in Appian that can receive requests from Jira via webhook. You will also need to configure the security settings for the Web API object, such as authentication method, allowed origins, and access control.
* B. Configure the connection in Jira specifying the URL and credentials. This will allow you to set up a webhook in Jira that can send requests to Appian when specific tickets change. You will need to specify the URL of the Web API object in Appian, as well as any credentials required for authentication.
* C. Create a new API Key and associate a service account. This will allow you to generate a unique token that can be used for authentication between Jira and Appian. You will also need to create a service account in Appian that has permissions to access or update data related to Jira tickets.
The other options are incorrect for the following reasons:
* D. Give the service account system administrator privileges. This is not required and could pose a security risk, as giving system administrator privileges to a service account could allow it to perform actions that are not related to Jira tickets, such as modifying system settings or accessing sensitive data.
* E. Create an integration object from Appian to Jira to periodically check the ticket status. This is not required and could cause unnecessary overhead, as creating an integration object from Appian to Jira would involve polling Jira for ticket status changes, which could consume more resources than using webhook notifications. Verified References: Appian Documentation, section "Web API" and "API Keys".

質問 # 14
You need to design a complex Appian integration to call a RESTful API. The RESTful API will be used to update a case in a customer's legacy system.
What are three prerequisites for designing the integration?

• A. Understand the different error codes managed by the API and the process of error handling in Appian.
• B. Define the HTTP method that the integration will use.
• C. Understand the business rules to be applied to ensure the business logic of the data.
• D. Understand the content of the expected body, including each field type and their limits.
• E. Understand whether this integration will be used in an interface or in a process model.

正解：A、B、D

解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
As an Appian Lead Developer, designing a complex integration to a RESTful API for updating a case in a legacy system requires a structured approach to ensure reliability, performance, and alignment with business needs. The integration involves sending a JSON payload (implied by the context) and handling responses, so the focus is on technical and functional prerequisites. Let's evaluate each option:
A . Define the HTTP method that the integration will use:
This is a primary prerequisite. RESTful APIs use HTTP methods (e.g., POST, PUT, GET) to define the operation-here, updating a case likely requires PUT or POST. Appian's Connected System and Integration objects require specifying the method to configure the HTTP request correctly. Understanding the API's method ensures the integration aligns with its design, making this essential for design. Appian's documentation emphasizes choosing the correct HTTP method as a foundational step.
B . Understand the content of the expected body, including each field type and their limits:
This is also critical. The JSON payload for updating a case includes fields (e.g., text, dates, numbers), and the API expects a specific structure with field types (e.g., string, integer) and limits (e.g., max length, size constraints). In Appian, the Integration object requires a dictionary or CDT to construct the body, and mismatches (e.g., wrong types, exceeding limits) cause errors (e.g., 400 Bad Request). Appian's best practices mandate understanding the API schema to ensure data compatibility, making this a key prerequisite.
C . Understand whether this integration will be used in an interface or in a process model:
While knowing the context (interface vs. process model) is useful for design (e.g., synchronous vs. asynchronous calls), it's not a prerequisite for the integration itself-it's a usage consideration. Appian supports integrations in both contexts, and the integration's design (e.g., HTTP method, body) remains the same. This is secondary to technical API details, so it's not among the top three prerequisites.
D . Understand the different error codes managed by the API and the process of error handling in Appian:
This is essential. RESTful APIs return HTTP status codes (e.g., 200 OK, 400 Bad Request, 500 Internal Server Error), and the customer's API likely documents these for failure scenarios (e.g., invalid data, server issues). Appian's Integration objects can handle errors via error mappings or process models, and understanding these codes ensures robust error handling (e.g., retry logic, user notifications). Appian's documentation stresses error handling as a core design element for reliable integrations, making this a primary prerequisite.
E . Understand the business rules to be applied to ensure the business logic of the data:
While business rules (e.g., validating case data before sending) are important for the overall application, they aren't a prerequisite for designing the integration itself-they're part of the application logic (e.g., process model or interface). The integration focuses on technical interaction with the API, not business validation, which can be handled separately in Appian. This is a secondary concern, not a core design requirement for the integration.
Conclusion: The three prerequisites are A (define the HTTP method), B (understand the body content and limits), and D (understand error codes and handling). These ensure the integration is technically sound, compatible with the API, and resilient to errors-critical for a complex RESTful API integration in Appian.
Reference:
Appian Documentation: "Designing REST Integrations" (HTTP Methods, Request Body, Error Handling).
Appian Lead Developer Certification: Integration Module (Prerequisites for Complex Integrations).
Appian Best Practices: "Building Reliable API Integrations" (Payload and Error Management).
To design a complex Appian integration to call a RESTful API, you need to have some prerequisites, such as:
Define the HTTP method that the integration will use. The HTTP method is the action that the integration will perform on the API, such as GET, POST, PUT, PATCH, or DELETE. The HTTP method determines how the data will be sent and received by the API, and what kind of response will be expected.
Understand the content of the expected body, including each field type and their limits. The body is the data that the integration will send to the API, or receive from the API, depending on the HTTP method. The body can be in different formats, such as JSON, XML, or form data. You need to understand how to structure the body according to the API specification, and what kind of data types and values are allowed for each field.
Understand the different error codes managed by the API and the process of error handling in Appian. The error codes are the status codes that indicate whether the API request was successful or not, and what kind of problem occurred if not. The error codes can range from 200 (OK) to 500 (Internal Server Error), and each code has a different meaning and implication. You need to understand how to handle different error codes in Appian, and how to display meaningful messages to the user or log them for debugging purposes.
The other two options are not prerequisites for designing the integration, but rather considerations for implementing it.
Understand whether this integration will be used in an interface or in a process model. This is not a prerequisite, but rather a decision that you need to make based on your application requirements and design. You can use an integration either in an interface or in a process model, depending on where you need to call the API and how you want to handle the response. For example, if you need to update a case in real-time based on user input, you may want to use an integration in an interface. If you need to update a case periodically based on a schedule or an event, you may want to use an integration in a process model.
Understand the business rules to be applied to ensure the business logic of the data. This is not a prerequisite, but rather a part of your application logic that you need to implement after designing the integration. You need to apply business rules to validate, transform, or enrich the data that you send or receive from the API, according to your business requirements and logic. For example, you may need to check if the case status is valid before updating it in the legacy system, or you may need to add some additional information to the case data before displaying it in Appian.

質問 # 15
You are taking your package from the source environment and importing it into the target environment.
Review the errors encountered during inspection:
What is the first action you should take to Investigate the issue?

• A. Check whether the object (UUID ending in 18028931) is included in this package
• B. Check whether the object (UUID ending in 18028821) is included in this package
• C. Check whether the object (UUID ending in 25606) is included in this package
• D. Check whether the object (UUD ending in 7t00000i4e7a) is included in this package

正解：D

解説：
The error log provided indicates issues during the package import into the target environment, with multiple objects failing to import due to missing precedents. The key error messages highlight specific UUIDs associated with objects that cannot be resolved. The first error listed states:
* "'TEST_ENTITY_PROFILE_MERGE_HISTORY': The content [id=uuid-a-0000m5fc-f0e6-8000-
9b01-011c48011c48, 18028821] was not imported because a required precedent is missing: entity
[uuid=a-0000m5fc-f0e6-8000-9b01-011c48011c48, 18028821] cannot be found..." According to Appian's Package Deployment Best Practices, when importing a package, the first step in troubleshooting is to identify the root cause of the failure. The initial error in the log points to an entity object with a UUID ending in 18028821, which failed to import due to a missing precedent. This suggests that the object itself or one of its dependencies (e.g., a data store or related entity) is either missing from the package or not present in the target environment.
* Option A (Check whether the object (UUID ending in 18028821) is included in this package):This is the correct first action. Since the first error references this UUID, verifying its inclusion in the package is the logical starting point. If it's missing, the package export from the source environment was incomplete. If it's included but still fails, the precedent issue (e.g., a missing data store) needs further investigation.
* Option B (Check whether the object (UUID ending in 7t00000i4e7a) is included in this package):
This appears to be a typo or corrupted UUID (likely intended as something like "7t000014e7a" or similar), and it's not referenced in the primary error. It's mentioned later in the log but is not the first issue to address.
* Option C (Check whether the object (UUID ending in 25606) is included in this package):This UUID is associated with a data store error later in the log, but it's not the first reported issue.
* Option D (Check whether the object (UUID ending in 18028931) is included in this package):This UUID is mentioned in a subsequent error related to a process model or expression rule, but it's not the initial failure point.
Appian recommends addressing errors in the order they appear in the log to systematically resolve dependencies. Thus, starting with the object ending in 18028821 is the priority.
References:Appian Documentation - Package Deployment and Troubleshooting, Appian Lead Developer Training - Error Handling and Import/Export.

質問 # 16
You are reviewing log files that can be accessed in Appian to monitor and troubleshoot platform-based issues.
For each type of log file, match the corresponding Information that it provides. Each description will either be used once, or not at all.
Note: To change your responses, you may deselect your response by clicking the blank space at the top of the selection list.

正解：

解説：

質問 # 17
......

It-PassportsはAppianのACD301試験の最新の問題集を提供するの専門的なサイトです。AppianのACD301問題集はACD301に関する問題をほとんど含まれます。私たちのAppianのACD301問題集を使うのは君のベストな選択です。It-Passportsは君の試験を最も早い時間で合格できる。学習教材がどんな問題があっても、あるいは君の試験を失敗したら、私たちは全額返金するのを保証いたします。

ACD301参考書内容: https://www.it-passports.com/ACD301.html

• ユニークなACD301受験記対策 - 合格スムーズACD301参考書内容 | 効果的なACD301認定デベロッパー 🌾 ☀ www.jpshiken.com ️☀️で▷ ACD301 ◁を検索し、無料でダウンロードしてくださいACD301最新問題
• ACD301試験対策書 🏴 ACD301最新知識 🛸 ACD301 PDF問題サンプル 🎍 ➠ ACD301 🠰を無料でダウンロード▷ www.goshiken.com ◁で検索するだけACD301認定資格試験
• 効果的なACD301受験記対策 - 合格スムーズACD301参考書内容 | 有難いACD301認定デベロッパー 🥌 ⏩ ACD301 ⏪を無料でダウンロード▶ www.japancert.com ◀で検索するだけACD301受験記対策
• 素敵なACD301受験記対策 - 合格スムーズACD301参考書内容 | 100％合格率のACD301認定デベロッパー 👒 サイト➥ www.goshiken.com 🡄で【 ACD301 】問題集をダウンロードACD301トレーリング学習
• 完璧なACD301受験記対策 - 認定試験のリーダー - コンプリートACD301参考書内容 😷 ☀ www.passtest.jp ️☀️サイトにて最新⮆ ACD301 ⮄問題集をダウンロードACD301基礎訓練
• ACD301試験の準備方法｜一番優秀なACD301受験記対策試験｜有難いAppian Lead Developer参考書内容 🥽 ⇛ www.goshiken.com ⇚から簡単に[ ACD301 ]を無料でダウンロードできますACD301 PDF問題サンプル
• ACD301試験の準備方法 | 実用的なACD301受験記対策試験 | 有難いAppian Lead Developer参考書内容 🧷 URL ➤ www.jpexam.com ⮘をコピーして開き、⇛ ACD301 ⇚を検索して無料でダウンロードしてくださいACD301受験記対策
• 素敵なACD301受験記対策 - 合格スムーズACD301参考書内容 | 100％合格率のACD301認定デベロッパー 🔀 URL ▷ www.goshiken.com ◁をコピーして開き、⮆ ACD301 ⮄を検索して無料でダウンロードしてくださいACD301トレーリング学習
• 完璧なACD301受験記対策 - 認定試験のリーダー - コンプリートACD301参考書内容 🟥 サイト[ www.pass4test.jp ]で▶ ACD301 ◀問題集をダウンロードACD301トレーリング学習
• ユニークなACD301受験記対策 - 合格スムーズACD301参考書内容 | 効果的なACD301認定デベロッパー 👰 今すぐ➽ www.goshiken.com 🢪で“ ACD301 ”を検索して、無料でダウンロードしてくださいACD301資格認証攻略
• ACD301問題と解答 ✅ ACD301模擬練習 📍 ACD301受験方法 🪒 今すぐ☀ www.passtest.jp ️☀️で（ ACD301 ）を検索して、無料でダウンロードしてくださいACD301基礎訓練
• mpgimer.edu.in, mpgimer.edu.in, motionentrance.edu.np, lurn.macdonaldopara.com, www.lingogurugerman.com, www.teachmenow.eu, oshaim.com, iibat-academy.com, www.wcs.edu.eu, jimfox642.slypage.com